Social Theories on Deviance: Essay

The Functionalist Theory\n\nThe functionalist system was ground on the work of Durkheim, Erikson and Merton and what makes the functionalist opposite from other theories is that it sees crime and deviation in a confirmatory light. The functionalists consider diversion a normal part of vivification and that it has negative and positive effects. They gestate that deviance assists race in defining the limits of acceptable fond standards and. Durkheim coined a term anomy which means sort of destabilized when various(prenominal) behavior cannot be controlled by society. (Schaefer 166)\n\nConflict Theory\n\nThe infringe theorys perspective on deviance and crime is quite distinct from the view adopted by the functionalists. Deviance is defined as being caused due to the troth between antithetic roles of different members of the society. In addition the laws enacted atomic number 18 also there to cherish the powerful people and trammel them on top. (Schaefer 169) The con flict theory also assumes that laws argon do so that some acts argon considered acceptable while others atomic number 18 not as they atomic number 18 perpetuated by the rich and powerful. For mannikin Marijuana is illegal; however, Cigarettes which are very harmful are legal because big corporations transcend astray them. (Schaefer 170)\n\nThe Interactionalist Theory\n\nThe Interactionalist approach has to a greater extent to do with the interrelationships between people and the Interactionalist contend that the social norms and frugal conditions which force a someone to resort to deviant behaviors. (Schaefer 168)The air in this theory is on the socially formed excuses and meanings which lead to deviant behavior or according to the labeling theory because of a certain behavior of a group or one-on-one they are labeled deviant. (Schaefer 169)